Skip to main content

Performance audit of King County Sheriff's Office and Office of Law Enforcement Oversight

Performance audit of King County Sheriff's Office and Office of Law Enforcement Oversight

July 24, 2012

NEW! Download the latest follow-up report

Conducted in conjunction with a national law enforcement consulting firm, Hillard Heintze LLC, this audit evaluated the Sheriff’s Office Internal Investigations Unit and assessed the effectiveness of the county’s Office of Law Enforcement Oversight. This audit also included a review of best practices for managing citizen-initiated and internally-generated police misconduct and use of force complaints, and it made 16 recommendations. The Sheriff’s Office and the Office of Law Enforcement Oversight agreed with the recommendations.

Hillard Heintze, LLC also prepared a separate report on the same subjects (download the report).

Status

Of the 24 recommendations:

DONE 23 Recommendations have been fully implemented. Auditor will no longer monitor.
PROGRESS 0 Recommendations are in progress or partially implemented. Auditor will continue to monitor.
OPEN 0 Recommendations remain unresolved. Auditor will continue to monitor.
CLOSED 1 Recommendation is no longer applicable. Auditor will no longer monitor.

This audit of the Sheriff’s Office Internal Investigations and Office of Law Enforcement Oversight (OLEO) functions is the first in a series of annual audit reports mandated by the County Council in Ordinance 16511.Conducted in conjunction with a national law enforcement consulting firm, Hillard Heintze LLC, the purpose of this audit was to evaluate the current state of the Sheriff’s Office internal investigation operations and practices, and assess the effectiveness of OLEO in providing council-directed oversight of the IIU. The audit also included a review of national best practices for managing citizen-initiated and internally-generated police misconduct and use of force complaints.

Significant issues with KCSO’s policies for investigating and documenting complaints, and inconsistent adherence to those policies among KCSO units undermine organizational and individual accountability. KCSO’s inability to enforce its procedures for complaints and policy violations was also inconsistent with the Commission on Accreditation of Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA) standards or best practices.

Significant challenges were also identified in implementing OLEO as aneffective civilian oversight function under the current organizational andlegal framework. For example, a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)interpreting the King County and Police Guild collective bargaining agreement (CBA) contains a provision that allows for the termination of theOLEO Director as a possible remedy if the arbitrator rules that the directorhas violated any part of Article 22--Civilian Oversight provisions of the CBA.

We recommend that KCSO develop more detailed policies that outline the exact investigation and reporting processes for all complaints. These processes should become the standard that are categorically adhered to by officers and supervisors. We also recommend that OLEO, in collaboration with KCSO, continue planning and developing working guidelines and measurable objectives to assure that the effectiveness and benefits of law enforcement oversight are maximized in King County.

Reports related to this audit

Click on the image(s) below to view related reports.

January 24, 2017
Download the report
More info about this report

  

July 14, 2015
Download the report
More info about this report

  

June 21, 2011
Download the report

February 2, 2010
Download the report

 

October 30, 2006
Download the report

   

Audit team

Susan Baugh, Justin Anderson, Ron Perry conducted this audit. If you have any questions or would like more information, please call the King County Auditor's Office at 206-477-1033 or contact us by email KCAO@kingcounty.gov.

expand_less