Performance Audit of King County’s Investment in Information Technology
September 11, 2012
Our review identified opportunities for the King County to build on recent progress toward a strategic, countywide focus for information technology (IT) project investment. Though some processes are in place to ensure that the County selects IT projects strategically, developing a more rigorous approach and increasing fidelity to established processes will leverage the strategic alignment of the County’s IT project spending and provide decision-makers with the information necessary to make informed funding choices.
Audit Highlights
Recent actions show measurable progress; however, further improvements are needed in King County’s approach to IT investment as many current plans and practices could benefit from additional rigor and strategic focus. For example, the County recently consolidated its IT structure and transitioned to a service-based budgeting model, potentially improving transparency. However, in many cases we found that informal methods of IT project selection; significant schedule extensions; undefined business benefits; and unmitigated risks still hamper optimum IT investment. Further, we identified deficiencies in information provided to County Council as they are making project funding decisions. For example, IT project documents are often incomplete and contain unreliable data. Finally, we found that the County does not know if completed projects realized intended benefits. However, the County recently applied greater focus on benefits realization planning and our report provides recommendations supporting this effort.
Our recommendations are provided both to encourage improved performance and accelerate the achievement of actions already in progress. As is often the case, implementing improvements may require time and resources. A coordinated effort between PSB and KCIT will transition the County from an incomplete approach to investing in IT to ensuring that technology spending provides benefit to the County and the taxpayers. We have recommendations in three areas:
- A framework to ensure strategic and transparent IT investment governance and independent oversight;
- Rigorous, complete, and transparent IT project selection; and
- Effective systems to collect and analyze project information with a strong focus on ensuring realization of project benefits.
King County makes a significant investment in technology—$277 million in total active information technology (IT) projects this year. This report describes the extent to which the County optimizes technology spending to leverage results with transparency, accountability, and alignment with best practices.
Recommendation Status
Of the 15 recommendations:
- DONE: 13
Recommendations have been fully implemented. Auditor will no longer monitor. - PROGRESS: 0
Recommendations are in progress or partially implemented. Auditor will continue to monitor. - OPEN: 0
Recommendations remain unresolved. Auditor will continue to monitor. - CLOSED: 2
Recommendation is no longer applicable. Auditor will no longer monitor.